When Is the Heat Going to Be Taking Lhp Heat Applications Again

Looped rut pipes (LHPs) are ii-phase heat transfer devices that utilize the same capillary pumping of a working fluid every bit used in conventional heat pipes. LHPs can transfer heat efficiently up to several meters at any orientation in the gravity field. When placed horizontally, this distance tin can extend to several tens of meters.

The evolution of the LHP was driven mainly by a limit of conventional heat pipes in which the wick system abruptly decreases its heat transfer chapters, if the evaporator is raised college than the condenser. This demand was acutely felt in aerospace applications where the heat generated past the electronics had to be transferred efficiently away for dissipation purposes. But the device needed to be much less sensitive to changes in orientation in the gravity field. Figures 1a and 1b show the schematic of an LHP [1].

The development of looped oestrus pipes dates from 1972. Figure 1. Schematic of Principle of Performance of a Loop Heat Piping [i, ii].

The beginning such device, with a length of one.2m, a capacity of most ane kW, and water as its working fluid, was created and tested successfully by the Russian scientists Gerasimov and Maydanik from the Ural Polytechnic Institute. With estrus needing to exist transported over a longer distance, and because the working fluid apportionment in a heat pipe is straight proportional to the surface tension coefficient and inversely proportional to the effective pore radius of the wick, a different system for heat transport was required when the evaporator was to a higher place the condenser. This is shown in Figure 1.

The capillary head must exist increased to compensate for pressure losses when the liquid is moving to the evaporator while operating against gravity. This can merely be done by decreasing the effective pore radius of the wick. However, the increase in hydraulic resistance is approximately proportional to the square of the pore radius. As a result, it has not been possible to build a oestrus pipe of sufficient length that is capable of operating efficiently against gravity. Thus, there was incentive to develop LHPs, and they are at present finding further application in modern electronics.

As stated, a number of limits affect the performance of an LHP. Qing et. al. [iii] performed a detailed investigation of three key parameters on the performance of a looped heat pipe for use in cryogenics applications. This LHP is shown in Effigy 2.

ane) Effect of Wick Pore Size – It is well known that the maximum capillary pressure produced past the primary wick depends on both the effective pore size and the surface tension of the working fluid. In general, the smaller the pore size and the larger the surface tension, the higher the maximum capillary pressure. A smaller pore size will also result in larger flow resistance which volition limit heat transfer capability. The pore sizes considered were ii and 10 μm.
Effigy 2. Schematic of an LHP for Cryogenics Awarding [3].
When the pore size of the primary wick is larger (10mm), the estrus transfer capability of the LHP tin can reach 26 W simply when a smaller reservoir (60cc) is used. Its ability to operate against gravity is greatly weakened. With a wick pore size of 2mm, the LHP tin transfer a heat load of 26 W under horizontal orientation no matter what size reservoir volume is used.

Figure 2. Schematic of an LHP for Cryogenics Application [3].

2. Effect of Reservoir Size – It is interesting to meet how the LHP will role with different reservoir sizes. As shown in Figure 3, the combination of gravity and reservoir size has a direct affect on the heat transfer capability of the LHP. Nether adverse gravity, the heat transfer capability of the LHP is 12 W using the larger reservoir and merely 5W using the smaller i.
Figure 3. Heat Transfer Capability of LHPs with 2mm and 10mm Pore Diameters in Horizontal Orientation [3].

iii. Issue of Working Fluid – Fluids have different surface tensions that impact the heat transport adequacy of the LHP.

Effigy 4 demonstrates this capability:
Figure 4. Heat Transfer Capability of an LHP When the Working Fluid is Oxygen [three].

Though not shown in Effigy 4, when the working fluid is oxygen instead of nitrogen, the oestrus transfer capability tin be up to 50 W under horizontal orientation with the other experimental conditions remaining the same.

LHP Applications
This discussion has highlighted the functionality and importance of design parameters on the performance of LHPs. While this give-and-take concerns an aerospace application, LHPs accept been used for standard electronics every bit well. Maydanik gives several examples where miniature LHPs are used for microelectronics [1]. Effigy 5 shows the "use of flat disk-shaped evaporators in LHPs. The scheme and the external view of such evaporators 10 and 13mm
thick, whose thermo-contact surface is fabricated in the form of a flange 45 mm in diameter for fixing the oestrus source. The results of evolution of ammonia LHPs 0.86m and 1m long with a vapor and a liquid line 2mm in diameter equipped with such evaporators of stainless steel. In trials the devices demonstrated serviceability at any orientations in 1-yard conditions. The maximum chapters was, respectively, 90–110 West and 120–160 Due west, depending on the orientation, and the value of the minimum thermal resistance 0.30 K/Due west and 0.42 G/Due west."

Figure 5. Photo and Schematic of Flat, Disk-Shaped Evaporators in an LHP [ane].

Another design is shown in Figure half dozen, where miniature LHPs are made from stainless steel and copper and the working fluids are ammonia and h2o . The ammonia LHP has a 5mm diameter evaporator with a titanium wick, and 2mm diameter lines for vapor and liquid.. The h2o LHP is equipped with a 6mm diameter evaporator and 2.5mm bore lines. The effective length of the devices is about 300mm.

Figure 6. Miniature LHPs [1].

Each has a finned condenser, 62mm long, whose full surface is near 400cmⁱⁱ. The condensers are cooled by a fan providing an air flow rate of 0.64 mⁱⁱⁱ/min, at a temperature of 22 ± 2°C.
Tests show that the maximum capacity of the ammonia LHP is 95 W at an evaporator wall temperature of 93°C. The maximum capacity for the water LHP was not accomplished, but at the same temperature it was equal to 130 W. The minimum thermal resistance values of the LHP, 0.12 K/W and 0.1K/W, were obtained at rut loads of 70 W and 130 Due west, respectively. It should be noted that the ammonia LHP demonstrated a college value of for heat transfer coefficient in the evaporator, which reached 78,000 Due west/m2K at a heat flow density of 21.2 W/cm² at the surface of an interface with an area of 4 cm². For the water LHP, these values were, respectively, 31,700 W/m²K and 35 West/cmⁱⁱ. In this instance, at the surface of the evaporator'south agile zone, the heat flow density was much higher. For the ammonia LHP it was 44.5 Westward/cm², and for the water was 69.1 W/cm^two [3].

Figure vii. Photo and Schematic of a CPU Cooler Based on an LHP [4, 5].

Another example of LHPs in microelectronics is shown in Figure 7. Here, an LHP was designed for cooling a 25-thirty W processor with a total weight of 50g. This LHP was based on copper-water with an evaporator diameter of 6mm.
In determination, LHPs may resolve many of the drawbacks seen in conventional heat pipes and provide additional capabilities. As shown by Maydanik, the capillary machinery, in conjunction with the reservoir size and the employ of different fluids, can bring significant advantages that may not readily exist seen in heat pipes. Some of these include:

• the use of fine-pored wicks,
• maximum subtract in the distance of the liquid motion in the wick,
• organization of constructive heat substitution during the evaporation and condensation of a working fluid, and,
• maximum subtract in pressure level losses in the transportation (adiabatic) department.

Along with the advantages gained from LHPs, the use of liquids in electronics and potential operational instability must be considered carefully. Operational instability, if not managed, could conceivably create thermal cycling on the electronics component existence cooled. As with heat pipes,operational dry out or the loss of fluid due to leakage could render the LHP inoperable. Otherwise, LHPs appear to be an attractive supplement to the arsenal of cooling options bachelor to the pattern engineer. ■

References:
1. Maydanik, Y.., Loop Estrus Pipes, Practical Thermal Engineering, 2005.
2. Muraoka, I., Ramos, F., Vlassov, Five., Analysis of the Operational Characteristics and Limits of a Loop Oestrus Pipe with Porous Element in the Condenser, International Periodical of Rut and Mass Transfer, V44, 2001.
3. Mo, Q., Jingtao, L., Jinghui, C., Investigation of the Effects of Three Fundamental Parameters on the Heat Transfer Adequacy of a CLHP, Cryogenics V47, 2007.
4. Chang, C., Huang, B., Maydanik, Y., Feasibility of a Mini LHP for CPU Cooling of a Notebook PC, Proc. of 12th Int. Heat Piping Conference, Moscow, Russian federation, May 2002.
v. Pastukhov, Five., Maydanik, Y., Vershinin, C., Korukov, M., Miniature Loop Oestrus Pipes for Electronic Cooling

francisthed1996.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.qats.com/cms/tag/loop-heat-pipes/

Share this post